|
Last
week’s article was significant in many ways. Most significantly for
this duo, it represents a lot of work. This week’s effort will be
notably shorter—we’ll take your misplaced gratitude, but it’s really a
selfish decision.
Second,
last week’s article is a foundation that we expect to build upon. For
consistency’s sake, the “meat” of the rating system will remain the same
for this season—unless we specifically note otherwise. We may, however,
change the appearance from time to time. If we do, we’ll update that
archived article appropriately.
Third,
going forward, we’ll spend minimal time explaining the CQ+. You can
read about it in last week’s article.
Finally, we can point out how inconsistent we are by completely
disregarding the plan we laid out last week. As opposed to offering a
case study on the Cowboys this week and the Pat’s next week, we’ll
combine those teams now, in preparation for a very exciting showdown
this Sunday.
It’s
games like this one where fantasy football can easily take a backseat to
the more traditional NFL fandom. At this point
in time, the Pats are favored
by 6 points. Like the large herd of popular NFL commentators (led in
action, if not with popular consent, by Sean Salsbury), we will
make a prediction regarding the outcome of this critical game that makes
the most sense by using hindsight. In other words, tune in next week
for that "foresight."
Beginning the ’07 season, here is the CQ+ for the Cowboys:
64
|
Adams |
Davis |
Kosier |
Colombo |
Gurode |
|
16 |
0 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
|
130 |
91 |
56 |
23 |
60 |
Beginning the ’07 season,
here is the CQ+ for the Patriots: 80
|
Light |
Kaczur |
Mankins |
Koppen |
Neal |
|
16 |
17 |
20 |
11 |
16 |
|
79 |
41 |
31 |
20 |
56 |
Through
Week 5 of the ’07 season, here is the CQ+ for the Cowboys:
85
|
Adams |
Kosier |
Gurode |
Davis |
Colombo |
|
20 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
20 |
|
135 |
61 |
65 |
96 |
28 |
Through
Week 5 of the ’07 season, here is the CQ+ for the
Patriots: 87
|
Light |
Mankins |
Koppen |
Neal |
Kaczur |
|
20 |
20 |
19 |
14 |
14 |
|
84 |
36 |
60 |
46 |
25 |
The
Cowboys’ CQ+ has increased dramatically since the beginning the season,
whereas the Pats’ CQ+ has only increased by 7. We suspect this means
that we should have had an easier time predicting success for the
Patriot skill players at the beginning of the season than we would have
had predicting it for the Cowboys, but we will have to test hypotheses
such as these going forward.
As a
reminder, you need to keep your expectations for the CQ+ low. We simply
do not expect that a X+Y will always yield a better offense than an X.
Two notables about the CQ+s above:
 |
The
Cowboys’ starting five have 360 collective starts between them (Adams
accounting for 36% of them). |
 |
The
Patriots’ starting five have 227 collective starts between them. |
Thus
far in the season, no reasonable person could claim that the Cowboys
and/or Patriots are under-performing on offense.
Through
week 5 of the NFL season, here are some pertinent facts:
|
|
Cowboys |
Patriots |
|
Total Offense Rank |
1st |
2nd |
|
Rush Rank |
7th |
3rd |
|
Pass Rank |
2nd |
4th |
|
Sacks Allowed |
8th |
1st |
|
Pass TDs |
2nd |
1st |
|
Rush TDs |
2nd |
1st |
|
20+ yards plays |
1st |
3rd |
|
40+ yards plays |
7th |
7th |
Those
that rolled the dice on role players like Marion Barber III and/or Sammy
Morris are feeling really good right now. In fact, pretty much any
player seeing significant time in either of these offenses is surpassing
expectations. Honestly, we’d like to make a real “prediction” for both
of these teams for 2007, but the reality is that we’ll have to sit back
and wait.
Some other notables that we dug up
while obtaining the above.
All five of the Patriots starting
linemen have played their entire careers in New England. Light is in
his seventh season, Mankins his 3rd, Koppen his 5th,
Neal his 7th and Kaczur his 3rd. In light of the
emphasis we place on continuity for the units under examination, this
may be the single most important factor in assessing the Pats’ success.
For the Cowboys, Adams (10th
season) and Gurode (6th season) can only make that claim.
Kosier is in his second season in Dallas, which is his third team thus
far in his career. Dallas is Davis’ second team, and this is his first
year as a Cowboy. And Colombo is in his 3rd year as a
Cowboy, and this is his second team. The success that the Cowboys are
enjoying would appear to suggest that talent goes a very long way
towards compensating for a lack of continuity—though fans of Tony Romo
and T. O. might argue that Dallas’ o-line need not be as talented as
other o-lines for the Cowboys to enjoy success. We are inclined to
reject this position, and we hope to build a case with hard numbers in
the coming weeks to support that argument. However, we can make one
promise that generalist NFL commentators won’t make: No matter what our
assumptions may be at this point, we will revise them or sharpen them in
response to the data we collect going forward. |