|
It should come as a surprise to no
one that St. Louis lost again last week. The Seahawks didn’t look like
the Super Bowl team they were a few years
back, but they did enough to beat the lowly Rams.
We expect neither Shaun Alexander
nor Stephen Jackson—on a going forward basis—to justify their
first-round draft status. In the case of Jackson, we place the blame
squarely on that team’s situation, with emphasis on their ridiculous
CQ+. In the case of Alexander, we
suggest that his deteriorating skills (or faltering work ethic)
contribute at least as much to his disappointing results as does his
team’s situation.
This week, we’re changing gears a
bit—but still digging up data for the CQ+. As opposed to reviewing two
teams playing against one another, we’ll focus on two teams in
completely different situations with two of the top running backs in
most fantasy scoring systems season-to-date: the Chargers and
Dolphins.
We wanted to hold off on Miami for a
while to see if the incredible anomaly, Ronnie Brown, could
continue his amazing out-of-place performance. You see, his team is
just bad. They are bad in the U.S., and they will be bad in the U.K.
Bad, bad, bad. However, Ronnie Brown has been a pinball wizard with
respect to production (NFL and fantasy). Mr. Brown’s very saddening
injury last Sunday has essentially forced our hands. So we decided—in
somewhat of a tribute fashion—to review his team’s offense this week.
Don’t forget about that big-time
trade a couple of weeks ago. When the Dolphins gave Chris Chambers
to the Chargers for a 2008 second-round draft pick, it gave the
appearance that Miami was focusing on the future, while the Chargers are
working for today (which is why we think it was a great trade). With
that link in mind, we’ll also focus on San Diego’s offense.
Beginning the ’07 season, here is
the CQ+ for the Dolphins: 56
|
V. Carey |
C. Liwienski |
S. Satele |
R. Hadnot |
L. Shelton |
|
20 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
16 |
|
32 |
80 |
0 |
39 |
109 |
Beginning the ’07 season, here is
the CQ+ for the Chargers: 95
|
M. McNeill |
K. Dielman |
N. Hardwick |
M. Goff |
S. Olivea |
|
16 |
19 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
|
16 |
29 |
43 |
115 |
46 |
Both teams saw some major shake-ups
on the coaching staffs after 2006, but the Chargers were able to keep
the team fairly intact from last year’s 14-2 juggernaut.
Through Week 7 of the ’07 season,
here is the CQ+ for the Dolphins: 74
|
V. Carey |
C. Liwienski |
S. Satele |
R. Hadnot |
L. Shelton |
|
20 |
7 |
7 |
20 |
20 |
|
39 |
87 |
7 |
46 |
116 |
Through Week 7 of the ’07 season,
here is the CQ+ for the Chargers: 99
|
M. McNeill |
K. Dielman |
N. Hardwick |
M. Goff |
S. Olivea |
|
20 |
19 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
|
22 |
35 |
49 |
121 |
52 |
While fairly weak, the Dolphins CQ
is really a split personality. Carey and Hadnot are both in their
fourth year and have spent their whole careers in Miami—offering a solid
foundation. Shelton is a nice complement, in his ninth year and playing
on this third team. But then you’ve got two newcomers, the wily veteran
Liwienski (10th year and on his third team), and the rookie
center Satele, who strip away all the continuity that the first three
guys bring to the table.
The Chargers, on the other hand,
offer a model of a CQ+. McNeill (2nd year), Dielman (5th
year), Hardwick (4th year) and Olivea (4th year)
have all played for one team in the NFL. While Goff (10th
year) has only played for two teams, and this is his fourth year in San
Diego. Last week, we used the pitiful Rams’ O-line to demonstrate a
flaw in our CQ+. This week, we offer props to the Chargers for keeping
such an impressive group together so long (in similar fashion to the
Patriots, we might add).
Here are some offensive rankings
regarding these two teams:
|
|
Dolphins |
Chargers |
|
Total Offensive Rank |
15 |
13 |
|
Points |
12 |
11 |
|
Rush Rank |
15 |
13 |
|
Pass Rank |
15 |
20 |
|
Sacks Allowed |
18 |
7 |
|
Pass TD's |
18 |
16 |
|
Rush TD's |
2 |
3 |
|
Rushing 20+ yard plays |
8 |
5 |
|
Passing 40+ yard plays |
26 |
26 |
Aside from sacks allowed, these
rankings look extremely similar. Yet most people would now place the
Chargers as a top five team in the loaded AFC, and the Dolphins (even
before Brown’s injury and the Chambers trade) have been viewed as one of
the worst in the NFL.
We think the Chargers’ numbers are
understated because of their weak passing game. CQ+ aside, if defenses
can consistently put eight men in the box, LaDainian Tomlinson
can only do so much. And while LT has been impressive these last few
games, his season has been “ok” so far. We blame these
not-so-impressive offensive rankings squarely on the quarterback failing
to throw successfully to anyone not named Gates (of the Chargers eight
TD passes, only three have gone to true wide receivers).
We think the Dolphins’ numbers are
overstated for two reasons. First, they’ve been granted plenty of
cosmetic production due to games in which a) they played against weak
defenses; and/or b) their opponents played prevent defense in the 2nd
half (most obviously against the Pats). Second, Brown has been
incredible. Through the not-quite seven games in which he played, he
ranks ninth in rushing yards per game, 11th in yards per
carry (minimum of 35 carries), and first among RB in receptions and
receiving yards. We’ll let the Sage of New England, Bill Belichick,
summarize our point, “Ronnie Brown is the best offensive player that we
have seen all year.”
We wonder what Brown would do with a
real team around him. Hopefully, we’ll find out next year. Godspeed,
Mr. Brown.
Our predictions:
 | A return to offensive domination
by the Chargers, based in large part upon Chambers’ ability to keep
defenses honest (irrespective of his production) |
 | Offensive rankings for the
Dolphins that will be more commensurate with their record, which is
“bad, bad, bad.” |
|